LEESLAB:
Computer-controlled gaze control in CVI-children
Hugo Maes,
Erik Vandenbussche, Pat Delaere, Sonja De Lauwe
|
 |
Subjects:
target group |
|
 |
Children with the
Cerebral Visual Impairment syndrome (CVI) have visual perception
dysfunctions based on congenital cerebral (brain)
lesions, not on ophtalmological deficits. Their
visual field and acuity can even be near-normal.
The syndrome also often includes motor
difficulties ('multi-handicaped').
These children fail to see complex scenes and
objects. Objects are often recognized by partial
and small details. This is probably linked to
their inability to guide their visual attention
and gaze direction effectively over the relevant
visual field, a defect which constitutes a form
of gaze apraxia. |
|
 |
CVI-children do
cope relatively well with their visual
environment, up to the moment they have to start
reading (and writing). They confuse letters; they
have problems with word synthesis and with gaze
control over the letters in a word, over the
words in a line, and over the lines themselves
(up down). They fail to adopt the correct
left-to-right reading direction and the
grapheme-phoneme link is defective. Writing also
poses serious problems that are partly due to the
motor deficit.
Conventional Low Vision Aids don't work as
expected. |
|
 |
Our laboratory is
involved in research of CVI, and has developed
some effective diagnostic tools in this field
(the L94 test). We currently started
development of a set of computer programs,
specifically intended to address the initial
technical reading deficit of CVI children with
methods based on gaze control, and the on
strengthening the grapheme-phoneme link. It is
expected that a much wider group of children with
developmental dyslexia and even analphabet adults
might benefit from the use of these programs.
The package is called LEESLAB (READLAB). |
|
 |
Material |
|
| Pictures |
Persons, objects,
concepts, scenes (2,800) |
|
| Textual |
Text on screen
(6,000 words) |
|
| Speech |
+ Generated speech (Lernout
& Hauspie TTS)
+ Human speech (3,500 spoken
words)
+ Spoken phonemes (70). |
|
| Lessons |
Each one
containing at least 10 exercises with any of this
material: 1500. |
|
Language
dependent material
is in Dutch but the programs
are open to any other language, provided:
+ another TTS language module is used,
+ the phoneme definition and spoken files are
replaced
+ the human speech files (*.wav) are replaced
+ the text material and lessons are replaced. |
 |
Methods |
|
The package is called LEESLAB (READLAB), and currently
contains
two programs.
+ WOORDLAB (WORDLAB) is mainly
word-oriented and interactive,
+ LEZER (READER) is mainly
sentence and continuous-text oriented
and less interactive.
In order to address the specific problems of
CVI-children, these programs have a number of common
features. |

Poor
Screen |
Many colorful and
dynamical screen elements used in popular first
grade training software, prove to be attractive
to normal children (cartoons, flashing numbers,
backgrounds, etc
). Its presence does,
however, seriously distract CVI children. Use of
such elements is avoided, or they are presented
as static and inconspicuous as possible, leaving
only the bare essentials on the computer screen. |
|

Single
key response |
A majority of CVI
children has motor handicaps in a varying degree,
which prevent them of easily using a keyboard
and/or a normal computer mouse. The program
interface has therefore been designed for single
key (spacebar, mouse-key) operation. In case of
word recognition, it is sufficient to make a
single key response when the right word is
highlighted amidst a number of distracters. |
|

Grapheme-phoneme
strengthening |
Whenever a word is
presented graphically, either as text or as a
picture, it can be spoken too. Speech is
continuous (normal), or by consecutive phonemes. |
|

Gaze
control |
Gaze is
controlled over text material only, and both in READER
and in WORDLAB. The text is
presented in the font type, the font size, and
the font and background color and contrast
suitable for the individual child. To facilitate
word synthesis, different groups in the word can
be differently colored (first letter, last
letter, particular sound groups, or letter
groups). |
|
|
 |
 |
Apart from
these static cues, dynamical cues
may be added to assist reading direction and
tracking. These consist of left-to-right
streaming blocks, arrows or sliders over the
word. Consecutive individual letters and phonemes
may be highlighted and spoken in the correct
reading direction also. |
|
| Gaze control is on 3
levels: |
 |
Letters within a
word (both READER and WORDLAB). |
|
 |
Over words in a
phrase or line: words are highlighted in the
correct reading direction and may bespoken at the
same time (READER). |
|
 |
Flickering blocks
show where to start on the next line downward (READER). |
|
 |
Specifics
about READER |
|
READER (LEZER) is a computer program that shows a word, a
sentence, or several lines on the screen, and reads
and/or spells it. Words and/or phonemes are highlighted
in the correct reading order. [Nevertheless, words can be
pointed at wish for reading or spelling].
Reading speed is computer-imposed, or on the pace of the
child. Words may be highlighted and read, or the child
may be allowed to read it first, then verify its correct
pronunciation.
Pictures matching the scene described may also be shown. |
| We also are successful using READER
to let a CVI child read texts that meet his intellectual
development level, but are way above his technical
reading skills. |
 |
Specifics
about WORDLAB |
|
| WORDLAB (WOORDLAB) is primarily word oriented, and a child
has to make a response to a stimulus. |
| Stimuli |
+ Text: presentation can be
permanent, fixed-period, or tachistoscopic
(single flash).
+ Pictures: objects, persons,
concepts, actions, and situations.
+ Spoken
words either by TTS or by human speaker. |
|
| Response |
+ Multiple
choice. The correct word is presented
amidst a number of distracters. The child can
point the correct response, or just hit any key
when the computers scan the alternatives.
+ Typing. For those able to type,
the correct response can be typed on the
keyboard. Complex letter groups or sounds may be
mapped on the function keys.
Phonemes and words can be pronounced as the child
types it, and feedback is immediate.
+ Speaking. An observer scores the
correctness by + or -. |
|
 |
Specifics
about computer based training in general |
|
| Computer based training of initial
readers is not a miracle remedy but in general, offers a
number of advantages over pencil-and-paper approaches. |
 |
There is complete
control over the spatiotemporal aspect of the
stimulus material. Dynamic stimuli can be used. |
|
 |
Stimulus
presentation is reliable and repeatable from
trial to trial. |
|
 |
Responses and
latencies can be measured accurately and
reliably. |
|
 |
There is
immediate feedback on errors and remediation is
instant facilitating the learning process. |
|
 |
The motivation
factor is high for the child more training
can be sustained with less fatigue. |
|
 |
To a certain
degree, unattended training is possible. Teachers
can handle more children with the same input of
effort. |
|
 |
Content and
setting of the programs is easily changed.
Material and training method can be tailored to
the childs training level, skills and
interests. |
|
 |
Logging of
material used, responses and progress is complete
and flawless. |
|
 |
Conclusion |
|
Over the past year, both programs
were used with several CVI children.
Two subjects in particular (Nico and Thomas) were
followed extensively and daily. The methods, stimulus
content and presentation in these programs has been
modified constantly to optimize its effects.
A couple of studies currently are under way measuring the
differential effect of several stimulus presentation
methods, and of the relevance of READER
as a reading prosthesis. |